Comments on Northern Law Blog: This is confusing.

I agree with your "this is confusing" point. My b...

2009-10-16T00:02:51.280-05:00

I agree with your "this is confusing" point. My best friend is an employee of the Chicago Sun Times and with their recent bankruptcy matters she received a book of legal jibberish in the mail concerning company policy changes. She understood nothing.

Michael, I read this blog because of your A+ legal...

2009-10-15T15:50:38.172-05:00

Michael, I read this blog because of your A+ legal insight and wit! You can call me an idiot, just no comments on my hair...

Yep. I already modified it. Thanks Mr. Trump. ...

2009-10-15T15:47:15.169-05:00

Yep. I already modified it.

Thanks Mr. Trump. I'm surprised that you still read this blog after I called you an idiot last year.

http://www.northernlawblog.com/2008/04/donald-trump-is-idiot.html

Mike, why don't you just attorney modify the sent...

2009-10-15T15:43:24.668-05:00

Mike, why don't you just attorney modify the sentence with the Seller's attorney (or Seller) to read "run." I'd cross it out, write "run" and have both attys (or parties) initial. Or you could do it w/ a letter.

I bet what happened is the Einstein who drafted the form had a sentence that read something like "the time limits under the contract shall toll until approval of the lender..." and changed it but left to the current sentence but accidently left in toll, which I agree with you makes no sense.